| Think Big projects are
nothing new to New Zealand business and the
national economy. We're a nation that regularly
punches above its weight and that applies as much
to the boardroom as it does to the sports field. Port
Taranaki's recent announcement that it aspires to
becoming the biggest port in New Zealand,
eclipsing Auckland and Tauranga, is a bold vision
and one that is doubtlessly supported by most
Taranaki exporters.
The
company plans to spend $25 million this year to
deepen the port, allowing it to service the
largest container vessels travelling to this part
of the world.
Taranaki's
plans include a new fast-track trans-Tasman
service, with two container ships running
continuously between Taranaki and Melbourne. The
port is also understood to be talking to Ports of
Auckland about launching a coastal shipping run
to move containers between New Plymouth and
Onehunga to feed the new service.
CBAFF
applauds any initiatives that lead to increases
in competition and capacity that will ultimately
benefit our members and the freight industry as a
whole. That support comes, however, with a
caution that overcapacity in a small market can
be very damaging.
While
Taranaki without doubt offers shorter shipping
times across the Tasman, that is only half the
solution. The key to its plans succeeding lie as
much in the port's ability to handle much higher
levels of incoming and outgoing freight, and the
reliability of road, rail and coastal
infastructure to then seamlessly transfer freight
around the country.

Traditionally
Port Taranaki has handled high volumes of gas and
petrochemical industry freight but has hardly
been viewed as a major player in terms of
container freight.
In
the year to June 2005 the port handled the
equivalent of about 48,500 standard-sized
containers. During the same period Auckland
handled more than 662,000, Tauranga over 394,000,
Napier 131,731 and Wellington 77,003.
Port
Taranaki's owners appear satisfiedthat, in
combination with a reborn coastal shipping
service, the rail infastructure is in place to
hub containers north and south. Questions remain,
however, about storage capacity if growth levels
envisaged are to become a reality.
Once
any major increase in freight levels is achieved
these higher volumes will put pressure on
existing rail links, leading to - and causing -
major delays.
The
availability of wagons could also be an issue.
Toll would have to be prepared to relocate wagons
off the main trunk routes to service New
Plymouth.

The
global view will also affect Taranaki's
ambitions.
Worldwide
rationalisation of port use is expected by most
industry players following the Maersk Sealand
merger with P&O Nedlloyd. The impact of this
merger on New Zealand remains unknown, but may
see the creation of large hub ports served by
either a revitalised coastal shipping industry or
an increase in rail freight.
With
Auckland and Tauranga obvious contenders for this
hub model, and Wellington's central location
giving it credentials as well, Taranaki could
face an uphill battle to figure in the final
analysis.
And
from a global persective it's not even beyond
possability that any hubbing model could even see
the likes of Brisbane being used as a hub for New
Zealand.
Whatever
happens, rationalisation and increasing
competition between New Zealand ports appear
inevitable.
We
live, as the saying goes, in interesting times.

|